ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

기계 학습 증강 조밀화된 정확 일치법 (ML-CEM)×이중 강건 추정 (AIPW)×
분야인과추론인과추론
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도2012-20192005
창시자Extension of Iacus, King & Porro (2012) CEM; ML integration developed in subsequent causal ML literatureRobins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
유형Matching / quasi-experimentalSemiparametric causal estimator
원전Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗
별칭ML-augmented CEM, ML-CEM, automated coarsened exact matching, ML-assisted CEMAIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
관련65
요약Machine Learning-Augmented Coarsened Exact Matching extends Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012) by using supervised machine learning to automate and optimise the coarsening step — the discretisation of continuous covariates into bins — rather than relying on researcher-specified cutpoints. This reduces both ad hoc subjectivity in coarsening decisions and residual imbalance, while preserving CEM's core logic of exact matching within coarsened strata.Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Machine Learning-Augmented Coarsened Exact Matching · Doubly Robust Estimation. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare