ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

머신러닝 증강 인과적 영향 분석×패널 이벤트 스터디×
분야인과추론인과추론
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도2015-20181990s–2020s (modern panel formulation)
창시자Brodersen et al. (foundational BSTS framework, 2015); Chernozhukov et al. (double ML augmentation, 2018)Formalized by Freyaldenhoven, Hansen, Perez-Orive & Shapiro (2021); widely applied in finance (Fama et al. 1969) and policy evaluation
유형Quasi-experimental causal inference with MLQuasi-experimental / causal panel design
원전Brodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. DOI ↗Freyaldenhoven, S., Hansen, C., Perez-Orive, J., & Shapiro, J. M. (2021). Visualization, Identification, and Estimation in the Linear Panel Event-Study Design. NBER Working Paper 29170. National Bureau of Economic Research. link ↗
별칭ML-augmented causal impact, ML-CausalImpact, machine learning causal impact, ML-augmented BSTSevent-study regression, dynamic DiD, relative-time regression, distributed-lag panel model
관련64
요약Machine learning-augmented causal impact analysis combines quasi-experimental counterfactual reasoning with flexible ML prediction models to estimate the causal effect of an intervention on a time series outcome. Building on Brodersen et al.'s Bayesian structural time series (BSTS) framework and extended by double/debiased ML methods, it constructs a synthetic counterfactual from donor covariates and infers the treatment effect as the gap between observed and predicted post-intervention outcomes.A panel event study estimates the dynamic causal effect of a treatment or policy by regressing an outcome on a full set of relative-time indicators — one for each period before and after the event — while controlling for unit and time fixed effects. The resulting coefficient plot shows how the treated units diverged from untreated units at each point in calendar time relative to their treatment date, making both pre-treatment trend violations and post-treatment effect trajectories immediately visible.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Machine learning-augmented causal impact analysis · Panel Event Study. 2026-06-17에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare