방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 종단적 문항 분석× | 종단 확인적 요인 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1970s–1990s |
| 창시자≠ | Vandenberg, Lance, Meade and colleagues in organizational/educational measurement | Karl Jöreskog (CFA framework); longitudinal extension by Wheaton, Muthén, and Alwin in the 1970s–1990s |
| 유형≠ | Item-level longitudinal diagnostic | Longitudinal latent variable / measurement model |
| 원전≠ | Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C. & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592. DOI ↗ | Widaman, K. F. & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). American Psychological Association. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | LIA, repeated-measures item analysis, longitudinal item calibration, item parameter stability analysis | longitudinal CFA, repeated-measures CFA, longitudinal measurement model, panel CFA |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Longitudinal item analysis examines how the statistical properties of individual scale items — difficulty, discrimination, factor loadings, and fit — remain stable or change systematically across repeated measurement occasions. It is the item-level foundation of longitudinal measurement validity. | Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis (longitudinal CFA) applies a theoretically specified measurement model to data collected at two or more time points. Its primary purpose is to verify that a scale measures the same latent construct in the same way over time — a prerequisite for drawing valid conclusions about change from repeated-measures data. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|