방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 종단 내용 타당도× | 종단 확인적 요인 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1995–2000 | 1970s–1990s |
| 창시자≠ | Haynes, Richard & Kubany (1995); extended to longitudinal contexts by measurement invariance researchers | Karl Jöreskog (CFA framework); longitudinal extension by Wheaton, Muthén, and Alwin in the 1970s–1990s |
| 유형≠ | Validity evaluation technique | Longitudinal latent variable / measurement model |
| 원전≠ | Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. DOI ↗ | Widaman, K. F. & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). American Psychological Association. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | longitudinal content validation, temporal content validity, repeated-measure content validity, content validity over time | longitudinal CFA, repeated-measures CFA, longitudinal measurement model, panel CFA |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Longitudinal content validity evaluates whether the items of a measure adequately and consistently represent the intended content domain not only at a single point in time but across repeated administrations. It ensures that the conceptual coverage of a scale remains appropriate and stable as measurement occasions accumulate over a study period. | Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis (longitudinal CFA) applies a theoretically specified measurement model to data collected at two or more time points. Its primary purpose is to verify that a scale measures the same latent construct in the same way over time — a prerequisite for drawing valid conclusions about change from repeated-measures data. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|