방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| Joanna Briggs Institute 비판적 평가 도구 (Critical Appraisal Tools) - 체계적 문헌고찰용× | 뉴캐슬-오타와 척도: 관찰 연구 품질 평가× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 연구방법론 | 연구방법론 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1998 (updated 2017) | 2000 |
| 창시자≠ | Joanna Briggs Institute (University of Adelaide, Australia) | Wells et al. (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute) |
| 유형≠ | Research methodology evaluation | Research team assessment |
| 원전≠ | Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). Critical Appraisal Tools. University of Adelaide, South Australia. www.jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools link ↗ | Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O'Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Retrieved from Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. link ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | JBI, Joanna Briggs | NOS |
| 관련≠ | 3 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Critical Appraisal Tools are a comprehensive suite of design-specific quality assessment instruments developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (University of Adelaide, Australia) since 1998. Unlike single-tool approaches, JBI offers over 15 separate checklists tailored to RCTs, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, qualitative research, diagnostic accuracy, and economic evaluations. JBI tools are widely used in systematic reviews, particularly in healthcare, nursing, and public health. | The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) is a widely used tool for assessing the methodological quality of observational studies (case-control and cohort designs) included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Developed by Wells et al. at Ottawa Hospital in 2000, it provides explicit criteria and a star-based scoring system that enables transparent, quantitative comparison of study quality across evidence syntheses. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|