방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 해석적 비판 담론 분석× | 해석적 담론 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 질적 방법 | 질적 방법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1980s–1990s |
| 창시자≠ | Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk (interpretive framing developed through constructivist qualitative traditions) | Rooted in interpretivist social science; systematised by Norman Fairclough, Margaret Wetherell, and others |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative discourse analysis design | Qualitative interpretive research approach |
| 원전≠ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745612126 | Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761923343 |
| 별칭 | interpretive CDA, constructivist critical discourse analysis, meaning-centred CDA, CDA-interpretivist | IDA, interpretivist discourse analysis, discourse analysis (interpretive), meaning-focused discourse analysis |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Interpretive critical discourse analysis (interpretive CDA) combines the power-and-ideology lens of critical discourse analysis with an interpretivist epistemology that foregrounds meaning-making, context, and the researcher's own positionality. It examines how language constructs social reality, legitimises or challenges power relations, and circulates ideological assumptions — while acknowledging that both the texts under study and the analyst's reading of them are socially situated and context-dependent. | Interpretive discourse analysis is a qualitative approach that examines how language constructs social realities, identities, and meanings within specific contexts. Operating from an interpretivist epistemology, it treats texts and talk not as transparent windows onto the world but as active sites where meaning is negotiated, and it seeks to understand those meanings from the perspective of participants situated within their social and cultural worlds. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|