방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| Ideal Point Estimation× | Wordfish× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | Political Science | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2004 | 2008 |
| 창시자≠ | Clinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition) | Jonathan Slapin, Svenja-Sophia Proksch |
| 유형≠ | Latent-variable spatial model of binary choice data | Generative text model for dimension reduction |
| 원전≠ | Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗ | Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S. O. (2008). A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 554-569. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | Ideal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal points | — |
| 관련≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point. | Wordfish is a statistical model for scaling documents on latent dimensions, developed by Slapin and Proksch (2008). Unlike reference-based methods like Wordscores, Wordfish uses a Poisson generative model to jointly estimate word frequencies and document positions without requiring reference texts or manual annotation. It is particularly useful for estimating time-series changes in policy positions and can scale documents from multiple languages simultaneously. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|