방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 건강 애플리케이션을 위한 시스템 사용성 척도× | 원격의료 만족도 척도× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 의료정보학 | 의료정보학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1996 | 2009 |
| 창시자≠ | John Brooke | Multiple researchers; consensus measure |
| 유형 | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| 원전≠ | Brooke, J. (1996). SUS—A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Weerdmeester, A. Thomas, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis. ISBN: 978-0-7484-0635-1 | Or, Z., & Kartak, F. (2009). Review of the empirical literature on telemedicine in the OECD countries: Does telemedicine improve outcomes? In M. Rechel, B. Goddard (Eds.), Improving healthcare quality in Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe. link ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | SUS-Health, System Usability Scale, SUS | TSS, Telemedicine Satisfaction |
| 관련 | 3 | 3 |
| 요약≠ | The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a rapid, validated tool for measuring perceived usability of digital products, widely adapted for health applications. Developed by John Brooke in 1996 and extensively validated by Bangor and colleagues, the 10-item SUS generates a single composite score reflecting users' subjective perception of ease of use, learnability, and overall system quality. Its simplicity and robustness have made it the de facto standard for usability assessment in health technology research. | The Telemedicine Satisfaction Scale measures patient satisfaction with remote clinical encounters, assessing perceptions of communication quality, technical usability, provider competence, and perceived benefit. While no single universal scale dominates the literature, core satisfaction domains—connection quality, provider accessibility, clinical effectiveness, and likelihood to recommend—are consistently measured across telemedicine studies to evaluate user acceptance and identify barriers to adoption. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|