ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Giacomini-White 조건부 예측 능력 검정×모형 신뢰 구간 (MCS)×
분야계량경제학계량경제학
계열Hypothesis testHypothesis test
기원 연도20062011
창시자Raffaella Giacomini & Halbert WhiteHansen, Lunde & Nason
유형Non-nested forecast comparison testSequential hypothesis testing procedure for model comparison
원전Giacomini, R., & White, H. (2006). Tests of conditional predictive ability. Econometrica, 74(6), 1545–1578. DOI ↗Hansen, P. R., Lunde, A., & Nason, J. M. (2011). The model confidence set. Econometrica, 79(2), 453–497. DOI ↗
별칭GW Test, Conditional Predictive Ability Test, Giacomini-White CPA Test, Koşullu Tahmin Yeteneği TestiMCS Procedure, Superior Set of Models, Model Selection Confidence Set, Model Güven Kümesi
관련33
요약The Giacomini-White (GW) test, introduced by Raffaella Giacomini and Halbert White in 2006, evaluates whether two competing forecasting methods have equal conditional predictive ability given information available at the time of forecast. Unlike unconditional tests such as the Diebold-Mariano test, it asks whether one method systematically outperforms the other in specific economic or market conditions, making it especially useful for practitioners who need state-dependent forecast comparisons.The Model Confidence Set (MCS) is a sequential hypothesis-testing procedure introduced by Hansen, Lunde, and Nason (2011) that identifies the smallest collection of forecasting or predictive models statistically indistinguishable from the best-performing model at a given confidence level. Instead of selecting a single winner, MCS returns a set of superior models, making it especially valuable in econometric forecast comparisons where the true best model is unknown.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Giacomini-White Test · Model Confidence Set. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare