ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

전장 유전체 연관 분석 (GWAS)×전장 후성유전체 연관 분석 (EWAS)×
분야생물정보학생물정보학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도2005–20072008–2011 (term and framework established c. 2011)
창시자Klein et al. (age-related macular degeneration GWAS, 2005); landmark scale: Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (2007)Rakyan, Down, Balding & Beck (conceptual framework); Illumina arrays enabled large-scale application
유형Observational genomic association studyPopulation-scale epigenomic association study
원전Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. (2007). Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature, 447(7145), 661–678. link ↗Rakyan, V. K., Down, T. A., Balding, D. J., & Beck, S. (2011). Epigenome-wide association studies for common human diseases. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12(8), 529–541. DOI ↗
별칭GWAS, genome-wide association analysis, whole-genome association study, WGASEWAS, methylome-wide association study, epigenetic association study, DNA methylation association study
관련65
요약A genome-wide association study (GWAS) systematically tests hundreds of thousands to millions of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the human genome for statistical association with a trait or disease. By comparing allele frequencies between cases and controls — or by regressing SNP genotypes on a quantitative phenotype — GWAS identifies genomic loci that harbor common genetic variants contributing to complex traits. Since its large-scale debut in 2007, GWAS has catalogued thousands of robust disease–variant associations across virtually every common human condition.An epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) is a hypothesis-free, genome-scale method that systematically tests whether epigenetic marks — predominantly CpG-site DNA methylation — differ between individuals with and without a trait, disease, or exposure. By scanning hundreds of thousands of genomic positions simultaneously, EWAS identifies loci where the epigenome is reproducibly associated with a phenotype, offering a layer of biological regulation that classical GWAS does not capture.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Genome-wide association study · Epigenome-wide association study. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare