ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

두미트레스쿠-허를린 패널 그랜저 인과관계 검정×Kónya 부트스트랩 패널 Granger 인과관계 검정×
분야계량경제학계량경제학
계열Hypothesis testHypothesis test
기원 연도20122006
창시자Elena-Ivona Dumitrescu & Christophe HurlinLászló Kónya
유형Non-causality test for heterogeneous panelsNon-parametric bootstrap hypothesis test
원전Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. DOI ↗Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23(6), 978–992. DOI ↗
별칭DH Causality Test, Panel Granger Causality Test (Heterogeneous), Dumitrescu-Hurlin Test, Heterojen Panel Nedensellik TestiBootstrap Panel Causality Test, Kónya Panel Granger Causality, SUR-Based Bootstrap Causality, Kónya Önyükleme Nedensellik Testi
관련33
요약The Dumitrescu-Hurlin (DH) test, introduced by Elena-Ivona Dumitrescu and Christophe Hurlin in their 2012 Economic Modelling article, tests for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panel datasets. Unlike standard panel causality approaches, it permits each cross-sectional unit to have its own distinct causal relationship, making it well-suited for macro-panels of countries, firms, or regions where homogeneity cannot be assumed.Introduced by László Kónya in 2006, this method tests Granger causality in heterogeneous panels by estimating a Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR) system and deriving country-specific critical values through bootstrapping. Unlike pooled panel tests, it delivers a separate causality verdict for each cross-section, making it particularly valuable in applied macroeconomics and international economics when panel units are expected to behave differently.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Dumitrescu-Hurlin Causality · Kónya Bootstrap Causality. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare