방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 디지털 교육 실행 연구× | 교육적 실천 연구× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 현장 조사법 | 현장 조사법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1990s–2000s (digital integration of Lewinian action research traditions) | 1940s (Lewin); educational context developed 1970s–1980s |
| 창시자≠ | Rooted in Carr & Kemmis (1986); digital adaptation developed by Lankshear, Knobel, and others from mid-1990s onward | Kurt Lewin (action research foundations); Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott (educational adaptation) |
| 유형≠ | Applied qualitative-cyclical research design | Participatory qualitative research design |
| 원전≠ | Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A Handbook for Teacher Research: From Design to Implementation. Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335211357 | Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335096190 |
| 별칭 | technology-integrated action research, online educational action research, digital-mediated practitioner inquiry, DEAR | EAR, practitioner research, teacher action research, classroom action research |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Digital educational action research is a cyclical, practitioner-led inquiry method in which educators systematically investigate a problem or question arising in digitally mediated teaching and learning environments. Drawing on the action research tradition of Carr, Kemmis, and Lewin, it integrates digital tools — learning management systems, social media, video, online collaborative platforms — both as the context of inquiry and as instruments for data collection, making it particularly suited to contemporary technology-rich classrooms. | Educational action research is a cyclical, practitioner-led inquiry method in which educators systematically investigate a problem or opportunity in their own classroom or school, implement a change, observe its effects, and reflect on findings to guide the next cycle. Rooted in Kurt Lewin's action research framework and developed for educational contexts by Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott, it bridges the gap between educational theory and classroom practice by making teachers agents of rigorous inquiry. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|