방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 차별 문항 기능(Differential Item Functioning, DIF)× | 다집단 확인적 요인분석 (MG-CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1970s–1993 | 1971 |
| 창시자≠ | William H. Angoff and colleagues (ETS); systematized by Holland & Wainer | Karl Jöreskog |
| 유형≠ | Item-level bias detection | Measurement model / invariance test |
| 원전≠ | Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805809589 | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | DIF, item bias analysis, measurement non-equivalence, item-level measurement bias | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Differential item functioning identifies test or survey items that behave differently for examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — after controlling for the underlying ability or trait being measured. DIF analysis is essential for fairness evaluation in educational testing and psychological scale development. | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|