방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 비판적 은유 분석× | 해석적 담론 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 질적 방법 | 질적 방법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2004 | 1980s–1990s |
| 창시자≠ | Jonathan Charteris-Black | Rooted in interpretivist social science; systematised by Norman Fairclough, Margaret Wetherell, and others |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative-critical textual analysis | Qualitative interpretive research approach |
| 원전≠ | Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-1403932921 | Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761923343 |
| 별칭 | CMA, critical metaphor research, corpus-based critical metaphor analysis, ideological metaphor analysis | IDA, interpretivist discourse analysis, discourse analysis (interpretive), meaning-focused discourse analysis |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) is a qualitative method for uncovering how metaphorical language constructs, legitimises, or contests power relations and ideological positions in texts. Developed by Jonathan Charteris-Black (2004), it integrates Conceptual Metaphor Theory with the evaluative concerns of Critical Discourse Analysis to reveal the persuasive and ideological work performed by metaphors in political, institutional, and media discourse. | Interpretive discourse analysis is a qualitative approach that examines how language constructs social realities, identities, and meanings within specific contexts. Operating from an interpretivist epistemology, it treats texts and talk not as transparent windows onto the world but as active sites where meaning is negotiated, and it seeks to understand those meanings from the perspective of participants situated within their social and cultural worlds. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|