ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

반사실적 영향 평가 (CIE)×합성 통제 방법 (SCM)×
분야인과추론인과추론
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도1970s–2000s2003–2010
창시자Heckman, Imbens, Rubin, and the program evaluation literatureAlberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal (2003); Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller (2010)
유형Causal inference / program evaluationQuasi-experimental causal inference
원전Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, Part I: Causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. Handbook of Econometrics, 6B, 4779-4874. DOI ↗Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. DOI ↗
별칭CIE, counterfactual evaluation, counterfactual policy evaluation, impact evaluationSCM, synthetic control, synth estimator, Abadie-Diamond-Hainmueller method
관련54
요약Counterfactual Impact Evaluation is a family of causal methods that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing what actually happened to participants with what would have happened had the intervention not taken place. Formalised in the Rubin Causal Model and extended by Heckman, Imbens and others, CIE underlies most modern program and policy evaluation practice.The Synthetic Control Method estimates the causal effect of a treatment or policy on a single treated unit by constructing a weighted combination of untreated units — the synthetic control — that closely resembles the treated unit before the intervention. The gap between the treated unit and its synthetic counterpart after the intervention is the estimated treatment effect.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Counterfactual Impact Evaluation · Synthetic Control Method. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare