방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 컴퓨터화 적응 검사(CAT)에서의 판별 타당도× | 판별 타당도× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1959 (discriminant validity); CAT application from 1990s onward | 1959 |
| 창시자≠ | Campbell & Fiske (discriminant validity framework); applied to CAT by educational measurement researchers | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| 유형≠ | Validity evaluation technique | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| 원전≠ | Weiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37(2), 70–84. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | CAT discriminant validity, adaptive test divergent validity, CAT scale differentiation, CAT construct separation | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| 관련 | 5 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Discriminant validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is the evaluation process confirming that a CAT-administered scale measures its intended construct distinctly from related but conceptually different constructs. Despite the adaptive item-selection mechanism varying each respondent's item set, evidence must be provided that CAT-derived scores do not overlap excessively with scores from theoretically distinct scales. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|