방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 비교 디지털 민족지학× | 비교 사례 연구× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 질적 방법 | 질적 방법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1995–2000 (multi-sited framework 1995; virtual ethnography 2000) | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 창시자≠ | Christine Hine (digital ethnography); George E. Marcus (multi-sited ethnography) | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 원전≠ | Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761958963 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 별칭 | CDE, multi-site digital ethnography, cross-platform ethnography, comparative virtual ethnography | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Comparative Digital Ethnography (CDE) is a qualitative design that applies ethnographic methods — sustained participant observation, interview, and artefact analysis — across two or more digital settings simultaneously. By systematically comparing practices, meanings, and interactions in different online environments (e.g., distinct platforms, communities, or national contexts), CDE surfaces both site-specific patterns and cross-cutting cultural logics that a single-site study would miss. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|