ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

군집 무작위 대조 시험×야외 실험×
분야임상연구실험설계
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1999-20001920s–1930s (agriculture); 1990s–2000s (social sciences)
창시자Campbell, Grimshaw, Elbourne et al.Formalized by R. A. Fisher (1935); systematized in social sciences by Harrison & List (2004)
유형Research DesignExperimental design
원전Campbell, M. K., Grimshaw, J. M., & Elbourne, D. R. (2000). Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 30. link ↗Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055. DOI ↗
별칭CRT, cluster RCT, cluster trial, group randomizationfield trial, natural field experiment, randomized field experiment, field RCT
관련35
요약A cluster randomized trial (CRT) randomizes intact groups—schools, clinics, villages, or hospital wards—rather than individuals. Developed by Campbell, Grimshaw, and colleagues in the late 1990s to address real-world settings where intervention delivery or contamination occurs at the group level, CRTs are now standard for evaluating population-level, community-based, and policy interventions.A field experiment applies the logic of a randomized controlled trial in a naturally occurring, real-world environment rather than an artificial laboratory. Participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions while going about everyday activities, allowing researchers to estimate causal effects with high internal validity while preserving a level of ecological realism that laboratory settings cannot offer. The design is especially prominent in economics, public health, political science, and development research.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Cluster Randomized Trial · Field Experiment. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare