방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 베이지안 검정력 분석 (확신도)× | 베이지안 t-검정× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 통계학 | 베이지안 |
| 계열≠ | Hypothesis test | Bayesian methods |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1986 | 2009 |
| 창시자≠ | Spiegelhalter & Freedman (1986); O'Hagan, Stevens & Campbell (2005) | Rouder, Speckman, Sun, Morey & Iverson |
| 유형≠ | Bayesian sample size determination | Bayesian hypothesis test |
| 원전≠ | O'Hagan, A., Stevens, J.W. & Campbell, M.J. (2005). Assurance in Clinical Trial Design. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 4(3), 187–201. DOI ↗ | Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D. & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t Tests for Accepting and Rejecting the Null Hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | assurance, bayesian sample size determination, bayesian assurance, Bayesian Güç Analizi (Assurance / Bayesian Sample Size) | bayesian two-sample t-test, bayes factor t-test, Bayesçi t-Testi |
| 관련≠ | 3 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Bayesian power analysis — also called assurance — is a sample size determination method that replaces the frequentist notion of power with a probability-weighted average over a prior distribution on the effect size. First formalised by Spiegelhalter and Freedman (1986) and further developed by O'Hagan, Stevens and Campbell (2005), it answers the question: given our current uncertainty about the true effect, what sample size gives us a high overall probability of obtaining a statistically significant result? | The Bayesian t-test, formalised by Rouder and colleagues in 2009, is a two-group comparison method that works within a Bayesian framework. Instead of a p-value, it produces a Bayes Factor (BF₁₀) that quantifies the evidence the data provide for the alternative hypothesis relative to the null, and it reports the full posterior distribution of the standardised effect size δ with a highest-density interval. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|