Board Interlock Network Analysis
Board interlock network analysis treats the corporate economy as a network in which two firms are tied whenever they share a director, and studies how these interlocking directorates channel information, influence, and the diffusion of practices among companies. Mizruchi's 1996 Annual Review of Sociology synthesis crystallized the field, distinguishing the determinants of interlocks from their consequences and cataloguing the mechanisms — collusion, cooptation and monitoring, legitimacy, career advancement, and social cohesion — that interlocks have been argued to serve. Davis's 1991 study of how the poison-pill takeover defense spread through the board network gave the perspective its canonical demonstration that corporate practices diffuse along director ties. The method combines two-mode-to-one-mode network construction with positional metrics and diffusion modeling.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271-298. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271 ↗
- Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583-613. DOI: 10.2307/2393275 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Board Interlock Network Analysis (Interlocking Directorates as Inter-Firm Networks). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/strategic-management/board-interlock-network-analysis
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Diversification-Performance Analysis (Rumelt Categories)経営戦略論↔ 比較
- Merger and Acquisition Performance Event Study経営戦略論↔ 比較
- Upper Echelons (TMT) Analysis経営戦略論↔ 比較