Multidimensional Loneliness Assessment
Multidimensional loneliness assessment treats loneliness not as simple aloneness but as the distressing perceived gap between the social relationships a person wants and the ones they actually have. This cognitive-discrepancy view, rooted in Robert Weiss's distinction between emotional and social loneliness, holds that the absence of an intimate attachment produces a different, qualitatively distinct loneliness from the absence of an engaging social network. Daniel Russell's 1996 psychometric work, developing the third version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale, established the measurement properties, factor structure, reliability, and validity that anchor the broader assessment tradition. The framework matters enormously for gerontology because loneliness in later life is a strong, independent predictor of depression, cognitive decline, and mortality, yet it does not reduce to objective isolation. Measuring it well requires capturing the subjective adequacy of relationships across both intimate and network dimensions. The approach gives researchers reliable, validated instruments and a clear conceptual model of what loneliness is and how it should be scored.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20-40. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Multidimensional Loneliness Assessment (Discrepancy Model: Emotional and Social Loneliness). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/social-gerontology/loneliness-multidimensional-assessment
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Convoy Model Social Network MappingSocial Gerontology↔ 比較
- De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (DJGLS)社会心理学↔ 比較
- Lubben Social Network ScaleSocial Gerontology↔ 比較
- UCLA孤独感尺度社会心理学↔ 比較