Authorship Attribution of Canonical Texts
Authorship attribution of canonical texts uses computational stylometry to test who wrote disputed sacred and classical writings, most famously the letters attributed to Paul. Several New Testament epistles bear Paul's name but have long been suspected, on historical and stylistic grounds, of coming from later hands; stylometry brings quantitative evidence to the question. The approach profiles each author's style from large numbers of features, especially function-word frequencies, and either classifies a disputed text to the closest candidate or verifies whether it could plausibly belong to a claimed author against a field of impostors. Jacques Savoy's 2019 study revisited the entire Pauline corpus with modern methods, including Burrows's Delta, and found that it clusters into groups consistent with the traditional distinction between undisputed and disputed letters.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Savoy, J. (2019). Authorship of Pauline epistles revisited. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(10), 1089-1097. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24176 ↗
- Burrows, J. (2002). 'Delta': a Measure of Stylistic Difference and a Guide to Likely Authorship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(3), 267-287. DOI: 10.1093/llc/17.3.267 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Authorship Attribution of Canonical Texts (Computational Verification of Disputed Sacred Writings). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/religious-studies/authorship-attribution-canonical-texts
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ 比較
- Scripture StylometryReligious Studies↔ 比較
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ 比較
- Variant Collation and CBGMReligious Studies↔ 比較