System Justification Scale
The System Justification Scale operationalizes system justification theory, introduced by Jost and Banaji (1994), which holds that people are motivated to defend, bolster, and rationalize the existing social, economic, and political status quo, even when doing so runs against their personal or group interest. The general version, refined by Kay and Jost (2003), is an 8-item self-report measure on which respondents rate agreement with statements such as 'In general, the American political system operates as it should' on a 7- or 9-point Likert scale.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x ↗
- Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of poor but happy and poor but honest stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823-837. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). System Justification Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/political-psychology/system-justification-scale
どの手法を選ぶ？
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- 民主主義支持尺度（Democratic Support Scale）政治心理学↔ 比較
- 政治的イデオロギー尺度政治心理学↔ 比較
- 右翼権威主義尺度社会心理学↔ 比較
- 社会的優位性志向尺度社会心理学↔ 比較