Social Identity Political Measurement
Social identity measurement in political behavior applies social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) to political groups, treating partisanship, ideology, or movement membership as a social identity rather than a mere instrumental affiliation. Huddy, Mason and Aaroe (2015) adapted Mael and Tetlock-style identity items into a partisan social-identity scale that measures expressive, emotionally charged group attachment and predicts campaign activity and political emotion better than issue agreement.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1-17. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055414000604 ↗
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. ISBN: 9780818502781
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Social Identity Measurement in Political Behavior. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/political-psychology/social-identity-political-measurement
どの手法を選ぶ？
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Affective Polarization Measurement政治心理学↔ 比較
- Group Identity Measurement政治心理学↔ 比較
- 国民的アイデンティティ尺度政治心理学↔ 比較
- 政党帰属意識尺度 (Partisan Identity Scale)政治心理学↔ 比較