Partisan Business Cycle Analysis
Partisan business cycle analysis tests whether left-wing and right-wing governments produce systematically different macroeconomic outcomes. Douglas Hibbs's 1977 partisan theory argued that because left and right parties represent constituencies with different exposures to unemployment and inflation, left governments durably push for lower unemployment while tolerating higher inflation, and right governments do the reverse. Alberto Alesina's 1987 rational partisan theory added rational expectations and nominal wage contracts: when parties differ and election outcomes are uncertain, the surprise of who wins generates only a transitory burst of partisan divergence in output and employment, which fades once contracts adjust. The empirical method regresses macroeconomic series on a partisan government indicator and post-election dummies to distinguish permanent from transitory effects.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Hibbs, D. A. (1977). Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467-1487. DOI: 10.2307/1961490 ↗
- Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-Party System as a Repeated Game. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3), 651-678. DOI: 10.2307/1884222 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Partisan Theory of Macroeconomic Policy and Business Cycles. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/political-economy/partisan-business-cycle-analysis
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Central Bank Independence IndexPolitical Economy↔ 比較
- Economic Voting AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ 比較
- Political Budget Cycle AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ 比較