ScholarGate
アシスタント
Process / pipelineFutures studies / risk and resilience foresight

Wild Card Analysis

Wild card analysis is a futures method for confronting low-probability, high-impact surprise events — the abrupt discontinuities that conventional planning, anchored on expected trends, tends to ignore precisely because they are unlikely. The discipline of the method is to take such events seriously without succumbing to alarmism: to generate a deliberate set of plausible wild cards, assess each for its likelihood and the severity of its consequences, estimate how much warning the organization would have, and gauge its vulnerability. The payoff is not a prediction but robustness — strategies, capabilities, and contingency plans that hold up across a range of shocks rather than only in the expected future. As codified in the Millennium Project's Futures Research Methodology and located within Joseph Voros's generic foresight process, wild card analysis complements trend-based foresight by deliberately stress-testing the organization against the rare events that, by their very impact, can dominate its fate.

MethodMindで開く近日公開適用、比較、ガイダンスの取得
ツールとリソース
スライドをダウンロード
学習と探索
動画近日公開

手法の全文を読む

会員限定

無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。

ログイン

手法マップ

関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。

出典

  1. Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (Eds.). (2009). Futures Research Methodology, Version 3.0. The Millennium Project. ISBN: 9780981894119
  2. Voros, J. (2003). A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10-21. DOI: 10.1108/14636680310698379

このページの引用方法

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Wild Card Analysis (Low-Probability, High-Impact Surprise Assessment and Robustness Building). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/futures-foresight-studies/wild-card-analysis

どの手法を選ぶ?

この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。

並べて比較する

この手法を参照する項目

ScholarGateWild Card Analysis (Wild Card Analysis (Low-Probability, High-Impact Surprise Assessment and Robustness Building)). 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/futures-foresight-studies/wild-card-analysis · データセット: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026