Semi-Quantitative Risk Matrix Analysis
Semi-quantitative risk matrix analysis rates each risk on ordinal likelihood and consequence scales and combines the two in a grid to assign a risk level that drives prioritization. It is the workhorse of practical risk management: ISO/IEC 31010 lists the consequence-likelihood matrix among its standard techniques precisely because it lets analysts compare many disparate risks quickly without the data demands of a full quantitative model. The 'semi-quantitative' label captures its hybrid character — ordinal categories such as 'rare' or 'catastrophic' are anchored to rough numeric bands, giving more discipline than a purely verbal judgment but far less than a probabilistic calculation. The method's popularity is matched by sharp critique: L. A. Cox's 2008 analysis in Risk Analysis showed that poorly designed matrices can rank risks incorrectly, compress very different risks into the same cell, and even perform worse than random, making careful scale design and consistency checks essential rather than optional.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- International Organization for Standardization. (2019). IEC 31010:2019 Risk management — Risk assessment techniques. ISO/IEC, Geneva. link ↗
- Cox, L. A. (2008). What's Wrong with Risk Matrices? Risk Analysis, 28(2), 497-512. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Semi-Quantitative Risk Matrix Analysis (Consequence-Likelihood Rating). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/disaster-studies/semi-quantitative-risk-matrix
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Bow-Tie Risk AnalysisDisaster Studies↔ 比較
- Multi-Hazard Risk AssessmentDisaster Studies↔ 比較
- Preliminary Hazard AnalysisDisaster Studies↔ 比較