ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

統計報告基準:分析の透明性のある報告×IMRaD構造:序論、方法、結果、考察×
分野アカデミックライティングアカデミックライティング
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20051970
提唱者Statistical and methodological literature; emphasized by Cumming (2013), ICMJE, and replication crisis discussionsInternational scientific publishing community (adopted widely by 1970s)
種類GuidelineGuideline
原典Cumming, G. (2013). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. DOI ↗International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. link ↗
別名reporting statistics, statistical transparency, effect size reportingIMRaD, IMRAD, scientific manuscript structure
関連45
概要Transparent reporting of statistical results—including effect sizes, confidence intervals, p-values, and assumptions—is essential for scientific integrity and reproducibility. Many published studies report p-values in isolation without effect sizes or confidence intervals, making it impossible for readers to assess the magnitude of findings. Statistical reporting standards, emphasized by Cumming (2013), the American Statistical Association, and the ICMJE, require effect sizes, confidence intervals, and discussion of uncertainty. This enables readers to judge whether findings are practically significant (not just statistically significant) and to compare effect sizes across studies in meta-analyses. Poor statistical reporting wastes research and prevents proper synthesis of evidence.IMRaD is the standard organizational framework for scientific manuscripts in biomedical and natural sciences research. It separates reporting into four sequential sections—Introduction (why the research was conducted), Methods (how it was done), Results (what was found), and Discussion (what the findings mean)—enabling readers to understand, evaluate, and reproduce the work. Adopted as best practice by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) since the 1970s, IMRaD structure is now mandated or strongly recommended by most peer-reviewed journals.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Statistical Reporting Standards · IMRaD Structure. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare