手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 空間回帰不連続デザイン(Spatial RDD)× | 因果推論のための操作変数(IV)法× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 因果推論 | 医療経済学 |
| 系統≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2010s | 1990s (modern applications) |
| 提唱者≠ | Popularized by Dell (2010); formalized for geographic boundaries by Keele & Titiunik (2015) | Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory |
| 種類≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Method |
| 原典≠ | Dell, M. (2010). The Persistent Effects of Peru's Mining Mita. Econometrica, 78(6), 1863-1903. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| 別名 | Spatial RDD, Geographic RDD, Border RD Design, Geographic Discontinuity Design | IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation |
| 関連≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Spatial Regression Discontinuity Design uses a geographic or administrative boundary as the threshold that assigns units to treatment. Observations just inside one side of the boundary are compared with those just outside it, exploiting the near-random variation in treatment status near the cutoff to recover a local causal effect. The approach is widely used in economics, political science, and public health when policies or institutions change sharply at a border. | Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|