手法を比較

	ヘルスケアシミュレーションにおけるデブリーフィング評価（DASH）	専門職連携学習準備性尺度（RIPLS）
分野	健康教育	健康教育
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	2006	1999
提唱者	Jeffrey W. Rudolph, Robert Simon, Daniel B. Raemer	Gail Parsell & John Bligh
種類	Self-report observer-rated scale	Self-report questionnaire
原典	Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Dufresne, R. L., & Raemer, D. B. (2006). There's no such thing as 'nonjudgmental' debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 1(1): 49–55.	Parsell, G. & Bligh, J. (1999). The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Med Educ 33(2): 95–100.
別名	DASH Scale, Simulation Debriefing Assessment, Debriefing Feedback Scale	Readiness for IPL, RIPLS Scale
関連	4	4
概要	The DASH is a 20-item observer-rated instrument measuring the quality of debriefing—the structured, facilitated reflection following a healthcare simulation activity. Developed by Rudolph, Simon, and Raemer in 2006 at Massachusetts General Hospital, the DASH evaluates the debriefing facilitator's ability to create a psychological safety environment, elicit reflection on events, establish learning objectives, and foster insight into clinical decision-making. The scale is widely used in medical and nursing education to assess the fidelity and effectiveness of simulation-based learning experiences.	The RIPLS is a 19-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure healthcare students' attitudes and readiness toward interprofessional learning and collaboration. Developed by Parsell and Bligh in 1999, it assesses three core dimensions of interprofessional readiness: teamwork and collaboration, professional identity, and recognition of roles and responsibilities across professions. The RIPLS is widely used in health professions education to evaluate the effectiveness of interprofessional education initiatives.