ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

隠れたバイアスに対する感度分析(ローゼンバウム限界値 / E値)×局所的平均処置効果(LATE / CACE)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年20021994
提唱者Paul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value)Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996)
種類Sensitivity analysis for causal inferenceInstrumental-variable causal estimand
原典Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗
別名Rosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivityLATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE)
関連55
概要Sensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017).The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding · Local Average Treatment Effect. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare