手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ロバスト回帰不連続デザイン× | 因果推論のための操作変数(IV)法× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 因果推論 | 医療経済学 |
| 系統≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2014 | 1990s (modern applications) |
| 提唱者≠ | Calonico, Cattaneo & Titiunik | Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory |
| 種類≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Method |
| 原典≠ | Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R. (2014). Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295-2326. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| 別名 | Robust RDD, Bias-corrected RDD, CCT estimator, rdrobust | IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation |
| 関連≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Robust RDD extends the classical regression discontinuity design with bias correction and robust confidence intervals, addressing the under-coverage problem of conventional RDD inference. Developed by Calonico, Cattaneo, and Titiunik (2014), it uses local polynomial estimation with a bias-corrected point estimate and a wider variance term that accounts for the added uncertainty, yielding confidence intervals with correct asymptotic coverage. | Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|