ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

ロバスト回帰不連続デザイン×因果推論のための操作変数(IV)法×
分野因果推論医療経済学
系統Regression modelProcess / pipeline
提唱年20141990s (modern applications)
提唱者Calonico, Cattaneo & TitiunikAngrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory
種類Quasi-experimental causal inferenceMethod
原典Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R. (2014). Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295-2326. DOI ↗Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗
別名Robust RDD, Bias-corrected RDD, CCT estimator, rdrobustIV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation
関連43
概要Robust RDD extends the classical regression discontinuity design with bias correction and robust confidence intervals, addressing the under-coverage problem of conventional RDD inference. Developed by Calonico, Cattaneo, and Titiunik (2014), it uses local polynomial estimation with a bias-corrected point estimate and a wider variance term that accounts for the added uncertainty, yielding confidence intervals with correct asymptotic coverage.Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Robust Regression Discontinuity Design · Instrumental Variables in Health Research. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare