ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

ロバストなファジー回帰不連続デザイン×局所的平均処置効果(LATE / CACE)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年2014 (robust CCT estimator); 2001 (fuzzy RDD formalization)1994
提唱者Calonico, Cattaneo, and Titiunik (robust inference framework); Hahn, Todd, and Van der Klaauw (fuzzy RDD formalization)Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996)
種類Quasi-experimental causal inference with IV at thresholdInstrumental-variable causal estimand
原典Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R. (2014). Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs. Econometrica, 82(6), 2295-2326. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗
別名Robust Fuzzy RDD, Fuzzy RD with robust inference, bias-corrected fuzzy RD, CCT fuzzy RDDLATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE)
関連55
概要Robust Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at a threshold where crossing the cutoff raises — but does not guarantee — treatment receipt. Introduced by Calonico, Cattaneo, and Titiunik (2014), the robust framework applies bias-corrected local polynomial estimation with a robust variance estimator, correcting the coverage failures of conventional bandwidth-optimal inference in both the sharp and fuzzy cases.The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Robust Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity · Local Average Treatment Effect. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare