ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

リスク調整済み第IV相試験×逆確率重み付け法 (IPW / IPTW)×
分野疫学因果推論
系統Process / pipelineRegression model
提唱年1990s–2000s (formalized with ICH E2E and EMA PASS guidelines)2000
提唱者Regulatory and pharmacoepidemiology community (ICH, EMA, FDA frameworks)Robins, Hernán & Brumback
種類Observational / quasi-experimental clinical study designCausal inference weighting estimator
原典Strom, B. L. (Ed.). (2005). Pharmacoepidemiology (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0470863107Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
別名risk-adjusted post-marketing surveillance study, adjusted Phase IV trial, risk-stratified post-authorization study, PASS with risk adjustmentIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
関連35
概要A risk-adjusted Phase IV study is an observational or semi-experimental post-marketing study conducted after a drug or device has received regulatory approval. It uses statistical risk-adjustment techniques — such as propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, or multivariable regression — to control for confounding by indication and baseline patient differences, thereby producing more credible safety, effectiveness, and utilization estimates than unadjusted real-world analyses.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Risk-adjusted Phase IV study · Inverse Probability Weighting. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare