ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

質的研究における再帰性×質的研究における信頼性基準×
分野質的研究質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19901985
提唱者Anthony Giddens and Pierre BourdieuYvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
種類ConceptFramework
原典Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314
別名reflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practicetrustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmability
関連44
概要Reflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Reflexivity in Qualitative Research · Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare