ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

質的研究における信頼性基準×質的研究における再帰性×
分野質的研究質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19851990
提唱者Yvonna Lincoln and Egon GubaAnthony Giddens and Pierre Bourdieu
種類FrameworkConcept
原典Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗
別名trustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmabilityreflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practice
関連44
概要Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.Reflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research · Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare