ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

政策評価における傾向スコアマッチング×逆確率重み付け法 (IPW / IPTW)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年1983; policy evaluation adaptation 19972000
提唱者Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation applicationRobins, Hernán & Brumback
種類Quasi-experimental matching estimatorCausal inference weighting estimator
原典Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
別名PSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluationIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
関連65
概要Policy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Matching · Inverse Probability Weighting. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare