手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 順序尺度による内容妥当性評価× | 内容妥当性比率× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統≠ | Latent structure | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2003 | 1975 |
| 提唱者≠ | Wynd, Schmidt & Schaefer | Charles H. Lawshe |
| 種類≠ | Scale validation / content validity | Expert panel content validity assessment |
| 原典≠ | Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI ↗ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. link ↗ |
| 別名 | ordinal CVI, Likert-scale content validity, ordinal expert rating validity, graded content validity | CVR, Content validity index, Expert judgment content validity, Lawshe CVR |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Ordinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain. | The Content Validity Ratio (CVR) is a quantitative method developed by Charles Lawshe in 1975 for evaluating the extent to which items in a measurement instrument are relevant and representative of a target construct. The method aggregates expert panel judgments into a single validity coefficient for each item, enabling researchers to identify and retain only those items deemed essential by domain experts. CVR provides objective support for content validity claims during scale development. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|