ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

動学的操作変数法(動学パネルIV / Arellano-Bond法)×因果推論のための操作変数(IV)法×
分野因果推論医療経済学
系統Regression modelProcess / pipeline
提唱年19911990s (modern applications)
提唱者Arellano & Bond (1991); extended by Blundell & Bond (1998)Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory
種類Dynamic panel causal estimationMethod
原典Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. DOI ↗Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗
別名Dynamic IV, Dynamic Panel IV, Arellano-Bond GMM, System GMMIV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation
関連53
概要Dynamic Instrumental Variables estimation addresses endogeneity in panel models where the outcome depends on its own past values. By first-differencing to remove unit fixed effects and then using lagged levels as instruments for the differenced lagged outcome, it produces consistent causal estimates even when standard OLS or fixed-effects are biased by dynamic feedback.Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Dynamic Instrumental Variables · Instrumental Variables in Health Research. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare