ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

教育研究における差分の差分法×傾向スコアマッチング×
分野因果推論研究統計
系統Regression modelProcess / pipeline
提唱年1990s–2000s1983
提唱者Dynarski, Card, Angrist, and colleagues — applied in education economics from the 1990s onwardPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
種類Quasi-experimental causal inferenceMethod
原典Dynarski, S. M. (2003). Does Aid Matter? Measuring the Effect of Student Aid on College Attendance and Completion. American Economic Review, 93(1), 279-288. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
別名DiD in education, education DiD, quasi-experimental education design, education policy DiDPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
関連53
概要Difference-in-Differences (DiD) in education research applies the classic quasi-experimental DiD estimator to evaluate education policies, programs, and reforms. Researchers compare changes in student, school, or district outcomes between a group exposed to an intervention and a comparable unexposed group across pre- and post-intervention periods, isolating policy effects from background trends.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Difference-in-Differences in Education Research · Propensity Score Matching. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare