ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

コンジョイント分析×2^(k-p) 分割要因計画×
分野実験計画法実験計画法
系統Hypothesis testHypothesis test
提唱年19781961
提唱者Paul E. Green & V. SrinivasanGeorge E. P. Box and J. Stuart Hunter
種類Decomposition-based utility estimationScreening and economical factorial design
原典Green, P.E. & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103–123. DOI ↗Box, G.E.P. & Hunter, J.S. (1961). The 2^(k-p) Fractional Factorial Designs. Technometrics, 3(3), 311–351. link ↗
別名CBC conjoint, choice-based conjoint, adaptive conjoint analysis, full-profile conjoint2^k-p design, fractional factorial, screening design, Kesirli Faktöriyel Desen (2^k-p Fractional Factorial)
関連67
概要Conjoint analysis is a preference-measurement technique that decomposes overall product evaluations into the separate utility values — called part-worths — that respondents assign to each attribute level. Formalised by Green and Srinivasan in their seminal 1978 Journal of Consumer Research paper, the method has become the dominant tool in marketing research and product design for quantifying what buyers truly trade off when they choose between options.The fractional factorial design is an economical experimental strategy that investigates k factors by running only a carefully chosen 1/2^p fraction of the full 2^k factorial experiment. Formalized by George E. P. Box and J. Stuart Hunter in their landmark 1961 Technometrics paper, it exploits the sparsity-of-effects principle — that high-order interactions are typically negligible — to screen many factors with far fewer runs than a complete factorial would require.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Conjoint Analysis · Fractional Factorial Design. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare