ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

尺度に対する確認的因子分析×フロア・シーリング効果×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19692000
提唱者Karl G. JöreskogClassical psychometrics
種類Confirmatory factor analysis methodologyMeasurement validity assessment
原典Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183-202. DOI ↗McHorney, C. A. (2000). Ten recommendations for measuring health status. Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes, 2(1), 1-5. link ↗
別名CFA, Confirmatory factor analysis, Path analysis, Structural equation modelingFloor effect, Ceiling effect, Psychometric floor effect, Measurement floor
関連44
概要Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is a statistical method for testing whether a hypothesized factorial structure fits empirical data. Developed by Karl G. Jöreskog in 1969, CFA is the standard approach for validating psychometric scales by evaluating whether items load onto theoretically specified latent factors as expected. Unlike exploratory factor analysis, CFA requires a priori specification of the factor structure and provides goodness-of-fit indices to assess model adequacy.Floor and ceiling effects are psychometric phenomena in which a disproportionately large proportion of respondents achieve the lowest (floor) or highest (ceiling) possible score on a measurement scale. These effects compromise scale reliability and responsiveness, limiting the instrument's ability to distinguish among respondents and detect meaningful change over time. Systematic assessment of floor and ceiling effects is essential for evaluating the psychometric adequacy of health-related quality-of-life scales, functional status measures, and other patient-reported outcomes.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Scales · Floor and Ceiling Effect. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare