手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 尺度に対する確認的因子分析× | フロア・シーリング効果× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1969 | 2000 |
| 提唱者≠ | Karl G. Jöreskog | Classical psychometrics |
| 種類≠ | Confirmatory factor analysis methodology | Measurement validity assessment |
| 原典≠ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183-202. DOI ↗ | McHorney, C. A. (2000). Ten recommendations for measuring health status. Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes, 2(1), 1-5. link ↗ |
| 別名 | CFA, Confirmatory factor analysis, Path analysis, Structural equation modeling | Floor effect, Ceiling effect, Psychometric floor effect, Measurement floor |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is a statistical method for testing whether a hypothesized factorial structure fits empirical data. Developed by Karl G. Jöreskog in 1969, CFA is the standard approach for validating psychometric scales by evaluating whether items load onto theoretically specified latent factors as expected. Unlike exploratory factor analysis, CFA requires a priori specification of the factor structure and provides goodness-of-fit indices to assess model adequacy. | Floor and ceiling effects are psychometric phenomena in which a disproportionately large proportion of respondents achieve the lowest (floor) or highest (ceiling) possible score on a measurement scale. These effects compromise scale reliability and responsiveness, limiting the instrument's ability to distinguish among respondents and detect meaningful change over time. Systematic assessment of floor and ceiling effects is essential for evaluating the psychometric adequacy of health-related quality-of-life scales, functional status measures, and other patient-reported outcomes. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|