Controversy Mapping
Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
Leggi il metodo completo
Accedi con un account gratuito per leggere questa sezione.
Mappa dei metodi
Il vicinato dei metodi correlati — seleziona un nodo per esplorare.
Fonti
- Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI: 10.1177/0963662509102694 ↗
- Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558 ↗
Come citare questa pagina
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/it/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping
Quale metodo?
Affianca questo metodo ai suoi parenti più prossimi e leggili fianco a fianco — la biblioteca dispone i libri sul tavolo; la scelta è tua.
- Actor-Network Theory AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ confronta
- Boundary-Work AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ confronta
- Social Construction of TechnologyScience Technology Studies↔ confronta
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ confronta
Citato da
Metodi simili
Hai notato un problema in questa pagina? Segnalalo o proponi una correzione →