Boundary-Work Analysis
Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.
Leggi il metodo completo
Accedi con un account gratuito per leggere questa sezione.
Mappa dei metodi
Il vicinato dei metodi correlati — seleziona un nodo per esplorare.
Fonti
- Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325 ↗
- Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625
Come citare questa pagina
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/it/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis
Quale metodo?
Affianca questo metodo ai suoi parenti più prossimi e leggili fianco a fianco — la biblioteca dispone i libri sul tavolo; la scelta è tua.
- Controversy MappingScience Technology Studies↔ confronta
- Laboratory EthnographyScience Technology Studies↔ confronta
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ confronta
- Technological Frames AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ confronta
Citato da
Metodi simili
Hai notato un problema in questa pagina? Segnalalo o proponi una correzione →