ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Ponderazione Spaziale del Punteggio di Propensione×Abbinamento Spaziale del Punteggio di Propensione×
CampoInferenza causaleInferenza causale
FamigliaRegression modelRegression model
Anno di origine2000s–2010s2000s
IdeatoreExtended from Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003) IPTW with spatial adaptations by Keele, Titiunik and others in geographically structured causal designsExtension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) PSM to spatial settings; spatial adaptation developed in applied econometrics and epidemiology literature from the 2000s onward
TipoQuasi-experimental / causal inferenceQuasi-experimental matching estimator
Fonte seminaleKeele, L., & Titiunik, R. (2015). Geographic Boundaries as Regression Discontinuities. Political Analysis, 23(1), 127-155. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Aliasspatial PSW, geographically weighted propensity score weighting, spatial IPTW, spatially adjusted inverse probability weightingSpatial PSM, Geospatial PSM, Spatially-adjusted propensity score matching, Geographic propensity score matching
Correlati66
SintesiSpatial propensity score weighting extends inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to settings where units are geographically located and treatment assignment may depend on spatial factors such as location, neighborhood characteristics, or spatial clustering. By incorporating spatial covariates into the propensity score model and adjusting standard errors for spatial autocorrelation, it produces more credible causal estimates from observational geographic data.Spatial Propensity Score Matching (Spatial PSM) extends the classic propensity score matching framework to settings where units are embedded in geographic space and treatment assignment or outcomes may be spatially correlated. By incorporating spatial covariates and adjacency structure into the propensity model and matching procedure, it produces causal estimates that account for geographic confounding and spillover effects.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Spatial Propensity Score Weighting · Spatial Propensity Score Matching. Consultato il 2026-06-18 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare