ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Propensity Score Matching in Education Research×Ponderazione basata sul punteggio di propensione (PSW / IPW)×
CampoInferenza causaleInferenza causale
FamigliaRegression modelRegression model
Anno di origine1983 (foundational); education adoption widespread from late 1990s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
IdeatoreRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); widely adopted in education research via Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TipoQuasi-experimental / matching-based causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
Fonte seminaleRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
AliasPSM in education, educational PSM, PSM for program evaluation in schools, propensity matching educationPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Correlati56
SintesiPropensity Score Matching (PSM) in education research is a quasi-experimental technique that creates comparable treatment and control groups from observational student, teacher, or school data. By balancing groups on observed background characteristics, it enables credible causal estimates of educational interventions — such as tutoring programs, school choice policies, or teacher professional development — when random assignment is infeasible.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Propensity Score Matching in Education Research · Propensity Score Weighting. Consultato il 2026-06-20 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare