Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| Inganno e Debriefing nella Ricerca× | Processo di Richiesta al Comitato Etico× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Etica della ricerca | Etica della ricerca |
| Famiglia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anno di origine≠ | 1982 | 1991 |
| Ideatore≠ | American Psychological Association; International research ethics community | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; International research oversight organizations |
| Tipo | Guideline | Guideline |
| Fonte seminale≠ | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Protection of Human Subjects. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46, Section 46.116(a)(5). link ↗ | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Protection of Human Subjects. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46, Section 46.109. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | deceptive research, deception studies, debriefing, informed deception | IRB application, REC application, ethics approval, protocol submission |
| Correlati | 5 | 5 |
| Sintesi≠ | Deception in research—withholding information about study procedures, hypotheses, or true purpose—is ethically permissible under limited circumstances when specific criteria are met. The regulatory framework (45 CFR 46.116(a)(5) in the U.S.; APA Ethical Code Section 8.07) allows deception if: (1) it is not reasonably possible to conduct the research without deception, (2) the deception does not involve risks greater than 'minimal risk,' and (3) participants receive full disclosure and the opportunity to withdraw data after debriefing. Deception is particularly common in social and behavioral research (studying prejudice, conformity, ethical decision-making) where awareness of the true hypothesis would fundamentally alter behavior. Understanding when deception is justified and how to implement it ethically is essential for behavioral researchers. | Submitting a research protocol to an ethics committee (IRB, REC, or equivalent) is a mandatory procedural gateway in human subjects research. The application process requires researchers to document their study design, justify scientific rationale, disclose risks and benefits, provide participant protections (informed consent forms), and address ethical considerations. The submission includes a completed ethics application form, protocol document, consent forms, researcher CVs, and evidence of institutional support. This standardized process enables ethics committees to conduct rigorous, timely, and consistent review before research commences. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|