Elite Cue Experiment
An elite cue experiment isolates the persuasive power of source endorsements by holding a policy message constant and randomly varying who is said to support it. Grounded in John Zaller's receive-accept-sample model of mass opinion, which holds that citizens take cues from trusted political elites rather than reasoning from first principles, the design reveals how much opinion moves simply because a party or leader takes a side. Stephen Nicholson's work on polarizing cues shows that in-party endorsements can persuade while out-party endorsements provoke backlash, making the cue, not the argument, the engine of opinion change.
Baca metode selengkapnya
Masuk dengan akun gratis untuk membaca bagian ini.
Peta metode
Lingkup metode terkait — pilih sebuah simpul untuk menjelajah.
Sumber
- Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521407861
- Nicholson, S. P. (2012). Polarizing Cues. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 52-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00541.x ↗
Cara menyitasi halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Elite Cue Experiment (Party-Endorsement Persuasion Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/id/political-psychology/elite-cue-experiment
Metode yang mana?
Letakkan metode ini berdampingan dengan kerabat terdekatnya dan baca secara bersisian — pustaka menata bukunya di atas meja; pilihan ada di tangan Anda.
- Democratic Norms Support MeasurementPsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
- Issue Framing ExperimentPsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
- Partisan Motivated Reasoning ParadigmPsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
Dirujuk oleh
Metode serupa
Menemukan masalah di halaman ini? Laporkan atau usulkan perbaikan →