Democratic Norms Support Measurement
This approach measures how committed ordinary citizens are to democratic norms by observing the price they are willing to pay to uphold them. Rather than asking abstractly whether people value democracy, Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik's 2020 candidate-choice design confronts voters with a co-partisan candidate who violates a democratic principle and estimates how much electoral support that violation costs. Their finding that most Americans will tolerate undemocratic behavior by their own side when partisanship and policy stakes are high reframed the study of democratic backsliding around revealed, not professed, commitment. Christopher Claassen's parallel work links aggregate diffuse support for democracy to whether democracies survive.
Baca metode selengkapnya
Masuk dengan akun gratis untuk membaca bagian ini.
Peta metode
Lingkup metode terkait — pilih sebuah simpul untuk menjelajah.
Sumber
- Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392-409. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420000052 ↗
- Claassen, C. (2020). Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive? American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118-134. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12452 ↗
Cara menyitasi halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Measuring Mass Support for Democratic Norms (Candidate-Choice Tradeoff Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/id/political-psychology/democratic-norms-support-scale
Metode yang mana?
Letakkan metode ini berdampingan dengan kerabat terdekatnya dan baca secara bersisian — pustaka menata bukunya di atas meja; pilihan ada di tangan Anda.
- Elite Cue ExperimentPsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
- Skala Kepercayaan PolitikPsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
- Support for Political Violence MeasurePsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
Dirujuk oleh
Metode serupa
Menemukan masalah di halaman ini? Laporkan atau usulkan perbaikan →