Motivated Reasoning Experiment
A motivated reasoning experiment tests whether people process political information to reach conclusions they are directionally motivated to hold rather than the most accurate ones. Building on Kunda's (1990) theory and crystallized by Taber and Lodge (2006), these designs expose partisans to attitude-congruent and incongruent arguments and measure biased assimilation, disconfirmation bias, attitude polarization, and selective exposure.
Baca metode selengkapnya
Masuk dengan akun gratis untuk membaca bagian ini.
Peta metode
Lingkup metode terkait — pilih sebuah simpul untuk menjelajah.
Sumber
- Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x ↗
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 ↗
Cara menyitasi halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Motivated Political Reasoning Experiment. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/id/political-psychology/motivated-reasoning-experiment
Metode yang mana?
Letakkan metode ini berdampingan dengan kerabat terdekatnya dan baca secara bersisian — pustaka menata bukunya di atas meja; pilihan ada di tangan Anda.
- Affective Polarization MeasurementPsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
- Issue Framing ExperimentPsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
- Need for Closure ScalePsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
- Skala Identifikasi PartisanPsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
Dirujuk oleh
Metode serupa
Menemukan masalah di halaman ini? Laporkan atau usulkan perbaikan →